Research & Evidence

Search for a method

Search titles, questions, territories and MSC identifiers.

40 results
  1. MSC-P-001How do you turn a marketing claim into a testable question?Decision Science
  2. MSC-P-002Correlation or causality: what can an analysis actually support?Marketing Measurement
  3. MSC-P-003How should uncertainty in a marketing result be expressed?Decision Science
  4. MSC-P-004Statistical significance or effect size: which result should be interpreted?Decision Science
  5. MSC-P-005How do you measure a marketing construct that is not directly observable?Market Research
  6. MSC-P-006How do you design and validate a measurement scale?Market Research
  7. MSC-P-007Alpha or omega: how should scale reliability be assessed?Market Research
  8. MSC-P-009PCA, EFA or CFA: which method should you choose?Market Research
  9. MSC-P-010When should you run a marketing experiment?Marketing Measurement
  10. MSC-P-011How do you design an A/B test that actually estimates an effect?Marketing Measurement
  11. MSC-P-012How many observations does an experiment need?Decision Science
  12. MSC-P-013How do you measure campaign incrementality with a control group?Marketing Measurement
  13. MSC-P-017How do you detect selection, contamination and attrition in an experiment?Marketing Measurement
  14. MSC-P-018Predictive or causal regression: what are you trying to estimate?Marketing Models
  15. MSC-P-019How do you diagnose a marketing regression before interpreting it?Marketing Models
  16. MSC-P-022How do you estimate price elasticity and its uncertainty?Pricing Science
  17. MSC-P-026Logit vs Probit: how do you choose for purchase probability?Customer Science
  18. MSC-P-029Which customers have the highest probability of churn?Customer Science
  19. MSC-P-027TAM, UTAUT or UTAUT2: which framework should be used to study technology acceptance?Market Research
  20. MSC-H-001Measurement and causality: how can a marketing effect be established?Marketing Measurement
  21. MSC-H-002Marketing response models: shape, delay and saturationMarketing Models
  22. MSC-H-003Pricing science: connecting price, demand and contributionPricing Science
  23. MSC-H-004Customer and choice science: behavior, value and heterogeneityCustomer Science
  24. MSC-H-005Measurement science: building valid indicatorsMarket Research
  25. MSC-H-006Statistical decision methods: choose, quantify, validateDecision Science
  26. MSC-P-008How do you validate a marketing measurement scale?Market Research
  27. MSC-P-014How do you design a marketing geo experiment?Marketing Measurement
  28. MSC-P-015How do you estimate an effect with difference-in-differences?Marketing Measurement
  29. MSC-P-020How do you address price endogeneity?Pricing Science
  30. MSC-P-021Fixed or random effects: which panel model should you choose?Marketing Models
  31. MSC-P-023How do you estimate a demand function?Pricing Science
  32. MSC-P-024How do you simulate a price-volume-margin scenario?Pricing Science
  33. MSC-P-028How do you estimate CLV with BG/NBD and Gamma-Gamma?Customer Science
  34. MSC-P-030How do you analyze retention with a survival model?Customer Science
  35. MSC-P-031How do you build a useful customer segmentation?Customer Science
  36. MSC-P-032How do you test segmentation stability?Customer Science
  37. MSC-P-033How do you validate a marketing forecast?Decision Science
  38. MSC-P-034How do you build a Monte Carlo simulation for a marketing decision?Decision Science
  39. MSC-P-035How do you model saturation and adstock?Marketing Models
  40. MSC-P-039Which statistical test should you choose?Decision Science
All methods
METHOD DOSSIERMSC-P-001Evidence foundations

How do you turn a marketing claim into a testable question?

A question becomes testable when it specifies a population, unit of analysis, observable variable, horizon and an outcome that could contradict the hypothesis.

Direct answer

Write a measurable protocol before choosing a method.

A question becomes testable when it specifies a population, unit of analysis, observable variable, horizon and an outcome that could contradict the hypothesis.

Model or deliverableClaim → Population + X + Y + Horizon + Falsifier

Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery

ESTIMAND

Estimation profile

Unit of analysis
Declared unit or comparison × horizonControlled scientific terminologypopulation × unit × period
Exact estimand
Question + hypothesis + observable outcome
Model or deliverable
Claim → Population + X + Y + Horizon + Falsifier

01—08

Verifiable analysis framework

  1. 01
    Question

    How do you turn a marketing claim into a testable question?

  2. 02
    Estimand

    Question + hypothesis + observable outcome · population × unit × period

  3. 03
    Data

    population · unit_id · exposure_or_predictor · outcome · time_window

  4. 04
    Model or deliverable

    Claim → Population + X + Y + Horizon + Falsifier

  5. 05
    Declared calculation

    Claim → Population + X + Y + Horizon + FalsifierQuestion + hypothesis + observable outcome

  6. 06
    Uncertainty checks

    Operational definition · Pre-specified horizon · Falsifiable outcome

  7. 07
    Method-specific validation

    Check data, estimate stability and interpretation limits. Operational definition · Pre-specified horizon · Falsifiable outcome

  8. 08
    Limitations

    Prove a vague claim without a population, metric or horizon.

Required variables

  • population
  • unit_id
  • exposure_or_predictor
  • outcome
  • time_window

Checks · Controlled scientific terminology

  • Operational definition
  • Pre-specified horizon
  • Falsifiable outcome
Possible decision

Write a measurable protocol before choosing a method.

Not supported

Prove a vague claim without a population, metric or horizon.

Scientific sources

1 source

  1. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery

Method connections

Parent territoryStatistical decision methods: choose, quantify, validate

Read next

MSC-P-002Correlation or causality: what can an analysis actually support?MSC-P-010When should you run a marketing experiment?MSC-P-018Predictive or causal regression: what are you trying to estimate?